Largest Standing Army in the World: American Hunters

“Take Heart, we are many and they are few.”..not so fast. Ask yourself, how many of these 12 million will truly stand UP to tyranny when the day comes? If we use the tried and true percentage of 3% (of 12.7 Million) then that only leaves 381,000 Armed Men. Out of those 381K, how many have taken the time to get actual training in how to fight with a weapon? I think 3% might be too optimistic a figure. Something to consider. -SF

 

army1

Manasquan, NJ –-(Ammoland.com)- Fall hunting season is almost here and a fun annual topic of discussion around the campfires is always how large the U.S. population of hunters is?

And how does the number of U.S. hunters stack up against the largest standing armies in the world?

Much to the shagrin of anti-hunting forces across the USA, hunting numbers have remained steady over the last decade, even growing as more and more women get behind the gun and out in the field.

Check out our newest info-graphic on how American hunting forces stack up in size against the largest standing armies in the world.

Based on feedback, we have also included USA’s own standing army, and yeah we know there may be overlap between those two points of data, as a lot of our brave military is also active hunters, but this is fun facts, not life and death math.

Like our Largest Standing Army graphic? You are welcome to share it on your own websites, blogs and social media

. We know it will get the freedom hating pacifist worked up and hey, isn’t that the point?!

Read the Remainder at Ammo-Land

 

 

Gun Control: The Killer’s Best Friend

I am thankful for The Federalist and their staff for actively providing a counter-narrative to the anti-gun lib-tard propaganda that just recently got published in Newsweek…we knew it was coming,..it seemed the lib’s missed their chance with the last shooting in Charleston but got their confederate flag agenda pushed thru instead, so they were sure to capitalize on this shooting..I don’t know, call me crazy but I think the bigger issue at hand is obama’s total lack of any viable domestic counter-terrorism strategy which could lead to beheadings on main street and IED’s on Wall Street soon if nothing changes, and then, at that very moment, those libs who were screaming about citizens having AR’s and Glocks, will remember the words of Thomas Sowell who said ““If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared for barbarism.” 

gun-998x798

Abdulazeez shot his victims in a ‘gun-free zone,’ which is a useful illustration of the absurdity of gun-control laws: we constrain conscientious Americans but offer free rein to killers.

By David Harsanyi

Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez is suspected of murdering four unarmed Marines in Chattanooga and wounding others. As I write this, we still don’t know how Abdulazeez obtained his gun or what his motivations were—though, we can take an educated guess on the latter. What we do know is that Abdulazeez shot his victims in a “gun-free zone,” which is a useful illustration of the absurdity of gun-control laws: we constrain conscientious Americans but offer free rein to killers. In this case, even our best trained warriors were helpless.

Surely, we are in for a new round of emotional pleas for more gun-control laws. And, helpfully, in this week’s Newsweek cover story by Kurt Eichenwald we already have a compendium of muddled and misleading anti-Second Amendment talking points that dominate the Left these days.
The confusion begins with headline, which is based on an absurd premise, and bleeds into the lead:

Let’s start with an undeniable truth: In the United States, the people have the right to keep and bear arms. And let’s then acknowledge that the childish interpretation of that constitutional amendment—that Americans have the right to whatever accessory they can put on, in or over a gun for the sole purpose of making it more deadly—is a dangerous falsehood.

Read the Remainder at The Federalist