Crusader Corner: Surrendering To Death

This is one of the best interviews I have read thus far about the Paris Attacks and the State of the World when it comes to Terrorism in general. -SF

Eagles of Death Metal recently finished a Canadian tour and I got to sit down with vocalist Jesse Hughes and discuss the Bataclan attack in Paris that killed 89 of his fans. You’d think he’d want to avoid the topic, but he was actually eager to get into it. He sees it as a catharsis.

Hughes is not happy with the way the media has treated the story. Details are randomly pulled from his interviews and entire angles are edited in later that are diametrically opposed to his beliefs. Jesse Hughes is an ordained Catholic minister. He’s pro-gun, pro-Trump, and pro-life. He recognizes that Islam is the problem and political correctness is literally killing us.

Takimag: It’s hard to talk about the attack without sounding like you’re blaming the victims, but it’s impossible to deny fear of Islamophobia and fear of guns led to a lot of deaths that night.

Jesse Hughes: I saw fear fall like a blanket on the whole crowd and they fell like wheat in the wind—the way you would before a god. I was totally alert from the very beginning. The first thing I needed to do was find my girl. Fear took a backseat and “where’s my girl?” took over. I could smell gunpowder in the backstage area and I knew someone fired a round back there. I saw a guy with an FALand when he turned to face me his eyes looked like marbles. He was stoned out of his mind, and we now know they were on Xanax and cocaine. I recognized him. I’d seen him earlier in the day and noticed him staring at us.

They were in the venue early. That implies some staff were in on it.

I got in a lot of trouble for saying that. I know for sure that they were in there early. I remember them staring at my buddy. I just chalked it up to Arab envy. You know what I mean? When a Muslim sees a cocky American dude with tattoos, he stares at him. I realized later it was Abdeslam and he was staring at my buddy because they thought he was a threat. There’s no denying the terrorists were already inside, and they had to get in somehow. During the shooting I went outside and the backstage door was propped open. How did that happen?

Do you think political correctness is killing our natural instincts and making us vulnerable?

Definitely. There were two girls who were involved. They were at the venue and vanished before the shooting, and these women were in traditional Muslim garb. They knew people wouldn’t check them because of the way they were dressed. They got caught a few days later.

The fear of offending Muslims is a terrorist’s greatest weapon.

Look at the guys who bombed Brussels. They were wearing black gloves on one hand. Their luggage was too heavy to lift, but they didn’t want anyone helping them with it. Nobody brought any of this up until after the bombs went off.

Read the Remainder at Takimag

 

 

 

Crusader Corner: France Refuses to use Israeli Data Mining Tech That Could Have Helped Prevent Paris Massacre

It appears that France’s combination of non-existent immigration laws combined with a fear of being labeled “islamophobes” is not enough…they had to throw in good ole’ fashioned Anti-Semitism just for good measure, which has created the perfect breeding ground for terrorism to run rampant. Sound Familiar America? -SF

Better to shun and demonize Israel than to protect citizens from jihad mass murder.

“France refused Israeli tech that could have foiled Paris attacks – security expert,” RT, April 26, 2016:

French intelligence reportedly rejected an offer to purchase terrorist-scanning and tracking software from an Israeli company that could have helped to prevent the November 2015 attacks in Paris, a security expert has said.

Certain “data-mining technology” which would have helped the Paris authorities to “connect all the dots” in the terrorist community was offered to the General Directorate for Internal Security (DGSI), according to an Israeli counter-terror specialist familiar with the technology and the company, in comments to Fox News.

The DGSI is a French intelligence agency that specializes in counter-espionage, counter-terrorism and countering cybercrime. It also tracks potentially threatening groups.

“French authorities liked it, but the official came back and said there was a higher-level instruction not to buy Israeli technology… The discussion just stopped,” said the security specialist, who gave the interview on condition of anonymity.

The expert did not reveal the name of the company and the details of the technology, but said that the software can scan databases from various agencies, including Interpol, and detects “high-risk” people.

The technology was reportedly offered right after the Charlie Hebdo shootings in January 2015, prior to the Paris attacks in November that killed 130 people. The expert believes that such technology could have prevented the deadly attacks in the French capital, and may even have been able to allow the Brussels bombings of March 2016 to be foiled.

“Government agencies struggling to foil terror attacks need access to technologies that allow them to connect their data fragments, making it possible to handle daily data challenges,” the expert said. “With this system, all data can then be easily navigated, processed and represented by employing a set of powerful analytic tools and unique algorithms.”

EU officials, however, later told Fox News that there is no ban in the European Union on purchasing Israeli products….

Read the Original at Jihad Watch

I In Mine Own House

This was written by a French citizen and I think it really captures the feelings of a lot of people right now. We should all as concerned, armed citizens, heed the warnings written here. -SF

by Michael Devolin

“I in mine own house am an emperor
And will defend what’s mine.” –Massinger, The Roman Actor [1629]

Sir Edward Coke wrote, “The house of everyone is to him as his castle and fortress, as well for his defense against injury and violence as for his repose.” I believe the same can be said of one’s country. No matter how much I am maligned and excoriated (even by those who purport to be at my back and fighting the same battle), whether for my choice of friends or my condemnation of enemies, my country is my castle and fortress, as much for my defense as for my repose. But how am I to defend my country when my country is being subverted from within and turned into an enemy of my existence? How is my country to be my repose when I (and those of like mind) have discovered that the enemies of my country conspire under the same flag while posturing as patriots of that flag?

The most imprudent politicians of this country (and almost all politicians are imprudent, in my opinion) are those who believe that the imperialistic tendencies of Islam have lost their charm within our Muslim communities and that the subjugation and/or transmogrification of Western societies is not considered a viable goal of those same communities. I will never believe that such a goal is ever contemplated as an impossible reality by a majority of Canadian (or American) Muslims. Such expansionist contemplation is an essentially prescribed virtue of Islam proper. First you carve, and then you polish.

In his book Infidels, Andrew Wheatcroft objurgates Richard Perle and David Frum and their bookAn End to Evil: How to Win the War on Terror with his observation that, “A fifteenth-century manual against witchcraft and a twenty-first century manual against terrorism read rather differently, but their methodology is strikingly similar. Firstly, they lay out the conditions and causes of evil; secondly, they detail how evil spread and how it can be defeated; and thirdly, they present the operational necessities of a war on evil.” Here Mr. Wheatcroft’s argument against Perle and Frum and their proposed prescription for “the war on terror” is exposed as helplessly artless and not very well thought out, simply because witchcraft was an imagined evil, more than anything else a product of Christian superstition, whereas Islamist terrorism is overtly palpable and has caused immeasurable human suffering to date. To compare the war on terror with Christian persecution of witches is obviously simplistic, yet Wheatcroft concludes with unctuous reflection, “Killing witches ran its bloody course and eventually subsided. Can we halt a similar, modern, social panic, in its tracks?” Perhaps Mr. Wheatcroft should ask the citizens of Paris, France on this night of November 13th if they, deep-down, believe their “social panic” right now is merely an over-reaction to the seven terror attacks in that fair city tonight that have cost the lives of over 150 (as tallied thus far) innocent civilians. Should the people of France simply wait until this wave of Islamist terrorism runs “its bloody course”? Does he really believe that the hatred of the infidel (but especially the Jew), as taught in the Quran and from the pulpit of many mosques the world over, will somehow, someday subside and we all go to bed at night with smiling faces?

Read the Remainder at Jihad Watch

Dose of Truth: Why Now with ISIS?

By Hammerhead

Since the Paris attacks, ISIS is again at the forefront of global concern. All of the news & political rags are literally AWASH with articles about ISIS and terrorism.  I guess my question is why now? Why is ISIS such a bigger concern for the global community than it was a month ago? Surely it is not because we did not think they were capable of such acts as what happened in Paris. I mean these are the same people that drown their “enemies” by locking them in cages underwater and run over people with tanks. Is it Because they killed 129 people and wounded hundreds of others in a European Country and not a Middle Eastern one? A European country in which they were allowed (I dare say INVITED) by the thousands to enter unchecked? And Yes, it has been confirmed at least one, maybe more, of the Terrorist responsible for the Paris attacks were indeed Syrian refugees.

My point is these barbarians have been murdering innocent people, Christians for the most part, for a long time (over 3 years) in Syria and Iraq and yet, that barely garners 100 words or a blurb in a news rag when it happens. The lame-stream news yesterday made a big deal that over 15 nationalities were represented among the victims in the Paris attacks, but yet, I bet the same could be said of all of ISIS’ victims in Syria and Iraq BEFORE Paris, so what gives?

And this brings me to my second point, which is what is going on with this Reactionary concept to fighting terror?  Why do we have to wait for them to HIT us FIRST? Has not ISIS proven they are the enemy of civilization and Democracy?  How many innocent people were killed BEFORE Paris that we know of? Did not that alone warrant a FULL SCALE ATTACK?

And let me say this; It is obvious that the so called “successful air campaigns” that the U.S. and NATO have been doing for the past year have had ZERO effect on ISIS’ combat effectiveness. 129 Dead Civilians in Paris confirm this.

So, Ultimately, it all boils down to this: If WE (The United States) do not attack and attempt to wipe ISIS off the face of the earth, another PARIS TYPE MASSACRE WILL HAPPEN HERE. This of course begs the obvious question: Would you rather fight ISIS there (in Syria/Iraq) or here (In the United States)?France has already answered this question for themselves. Unfortunately, it cost 129 lives to come up with a definitive answer. I fear though that they have “courted the devil” for too long by allowing muslims to get a toehold in their country. Ever since the Algerian debacle in the 60’s, muslims have been setting up shop (a caliphate) slowly but surely in France. So ultimately, they may have to fight both home and abroad because of their own bad decisions.

The real question for America is do we want to follow the same REACTIONARY doctrine to fighting not only ISIS and Terrorism, but also the imperialistic agenda of islam in this country?

All things considered, with the Presidents decision to bring 10,000 Syrian Refugees into this country, I would say his answer is YES. He is willing to gamble American Lives and have ISIS bring the WAR here to American soil. Something thousands of soldiers, many of them my friends, died in the mountains of Afghanistan and the cities of Iraq to ensure never happens. Thankfully, 27 State Governors have had the common sense to say NO to this ideal. We can only pray to God that it sticks!

My last point is this. As a parent, how irresponsible would it be for this generation to SHRINK from this duty of ridding the world of these ISIS barbarians and consequently, passing this burden on to our children? I dare say it would be seen as the most cowardly act by a generation EVER. Let us not shrink from this task set before us. This nations next generation deserves better than to inherit our failures as men to do our duty.

Stay Alert, Stay Armed and Stay Dangerous.

Look at How the Barbarians Treat Wounded Civilians

Let this BURN into your memory really good. If something like this doesn’t make you want to prepare I don’t know what will.-SF

British survivor of Muslim terrorist attack at Bataclan Theatre says ISIS terrorists “tortured wounded victims by slitting their stomachs with knives”

Eyewitness Mariesha Payne said she knew people were being tortured by the sadistic gunmen because she could hear their screams without gunshots.

UK Mirror (h/t Metro T) ISIS terrorist used knives to torture their mortally wounded victims by slitting their stomachs as they lay on the floor, it has been claimed. An eyewitness who hid in a cellar for three hours as the armed murderers rampaged through the packed Bataclan Theatre in Paris said she knew people were being tortured because she could hear their screams.

Mariesha Payne, from Perthshire, told the Daily Mail: “We knew people were being tortured in the theatre because we heard people screaming, but they were not being shot and these were singular screams.

Read the Remainder at Bare Naked Islam