Holocaust History: Mapping the Holocaust

jews1

JERUSALEM — Nini Ungar clearly recalled that Friday in February 1942 when the Nazis loaded her, her husband and her parents on a cattle cart and transferred them, standing upright, to the railway station in Vienna.

She was in her mid-20s and did not yet know that she was pregnant. The family had already spent days in the squalid compound of a school where thousands of Jews destined for deportation were warehoused. She was among 1,000 on the transport that set out that day for the ghetto in Riga, Latvia.

“The Viennese were standing and laughing. ‘Finally they got the Jews out!’ ” Ms. Ungar, who was born Mina Tepper and was one of only 36 from that transport to survive the war, recounted in video testimony. “We scraped the ice from the windows — we were so thirsty. We didn’t have water. We didn’t have anything,” she said of the train journey.

Her journey across a wintry Europe can now be traced on a database that documents about 1,100 transports, searchable by train (or boat or bus) or victim’s name. A project of Yad Vashem, Israel’s Holocaust memorial and research center, the database sheds new light on the cross-border, Europewide nature of the stages leading to the mass extermination of some six million Jews, known in Hebrew as the Shoah.

Read the Remainder at New York Times

Cyber-Crime: Hackers Steal $81 Million in Sneak Attack on World Banking

Bet you did not hear about this during your morning coffee.Your money is not safe in banks anymore folks..between crooked Governments and wily Hackers you are better off using a coffee can.-SF

81

 

NEW YORK — Tens of millions of dollars siphoned from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. A shadowy set of casinos in the Philippines. A large bank in Bangladesh with creaky technology. An unknown, and perhaps uncatchable, group of thieves with sophisticated hacking skills.

What unites this mysterious mix of elements and enabled one of the most brazen digital bank heists ever is a ubiquitous and highly trusted international bank messaging system called SWIFT.

SWIFT — the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication — is billed as a super-secure system that banks use to authorize payments from one account to another. “The Rolls-Royce of payments networks,” one financial analyst said.

But last week, for the first time since hackers captured $81 million from Bangladesh’s central bank in February, SWIFT acknowledged that the thieves have tried to carry out similar heists at other banks on its network by sneaking into the heart of the global banking system.

“There are many banks out there right now saying, ‘There but for the grace of God go us,’” said Gareth Lodge, a payments analyst at Celent, a financial consulting firm.

The admission that the attack was not a one-time event in a developing country but perhaps part of a broader threat has thrust SWIFT into a spotlight, raising questions about how securely money is being moved around the world. Some financial security experts point out the SWIFT system is only as safe as its weakest link.

Read the Remainder at Boston Globe

Espionage Files: CIA Agent to Be Extradited to Italy to Face Charges of Kidnapping

First rule of being a Spy: Don’t Get Caught.

If you are interested in reading more about this case, and the CIA Practice of Rendition that occurred Post 9/11, check out  A Kidnapping in Milan: The CIA on Trial. -SF

Milan

The Portuguese Supreme Court has upheld a decision to extradite to Italy a former C.I.A. officer who was convicted in absentia in connection with the kidnapping of an Egyptian cleric in 2003, as the administration of George W. Bush ordered renditions after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

The former officer, Sabrina De Sousa, is a dual American and Portuguese citizen who has denied wrongdoing or involvement in the kidnapping, which took place while she worked undercover for the C.I.A. as a diplomat in Milan.

Her lawyer, Manuel Magalhães e Silva, said on Monday that he would appeal the decision to the Constitutional Court. The appeal, he said, would be based on the fact that there is no certainty his client will get a retrial in Italy, while the Portuguese Constitution guarantees a retrial in cases where the verdict is rendered in absentia.

Ms. De Sousa was briefly detained at a Lisbon airport in October after a European arrest warrant was issued. She was later released, after her passport was confiscated, pending a review of her case by the courts.

In an 11-page ruling made public on Monday but dated from a month ago, the court said that it did not find any reason to defer the execution of the European arrest warrant for Ms. De Sousa.

Mr. Magalhães e Silva said by email that it was not clear how long it would take for the Constitutional Court to reach a decision.

In 2006, Ms. De Sousa was among 26 Americans — believed to be 25 C.I.A. officers and one military officer — who were indicted in Italy for their involvement in the kidnapping of Osama Moustafa Hassan Nasr, a Muslim cleric known as Abu Omar, who was abducted from a Milan street in broad daylight in February 2003.

The cleric was held at an American military base in Germany before being flown to Egypt, where he claims to have been tortured before his eventual release.

The kidnapping led to tensions between the United States and Italy, and more broadly became a symbol of the American practice of renditions, in which a terrorism suspect is captured and delivered to another country for interrogation.

Mr. Nasr was sentenced, in absentia, by an Italian court in December 2013 to six years in prison for terrorist activities, although he never served the sentence.

Ms. De Sousa, who resigned from the C.I.A. in 2009, was sentenced in absentia in Italy to six years in prison. She has asked the Italian authorities for a pardon.

The Portuguese Supreme Court rejected Ms. De Sousa’s appeal after a lower court ruled that she should be handed over to the Italian authorities.

In Memoriam: A Spy For All Seasons, Duane Clarridge, Dies at 83

Clarridge

Duane R. Clarridge, a pugnacious American spy who helped found the C.I.A.’s Counterterrorism Center, was indicted and later pardoned for his role in the Iran-contra scandal, and resumed his intelligence career in his late 70s as the head of a private espionage operation in Afghanistan and Pakistan, died on Saturday in Leesburg, Va. He was 83.

His lawyer, Raymond Granger, said the cause was complications of laryngeal and esophageal cancer.

Mr. Clarridge was an unflinching champion of a brawny American foreign policy and of the particular role played by the C.I.A.’s clandestine service — a cadre he likened to a secret army that “marches for the president” and ought to be subjected to as little outside scrutiny as possible.

Mr. Clarridge, widely known by his nickname Dewey, delighted in the role of rogue. He often arrived at work in white Italian suits or safari jackets and bragged to other C.I.A. officers about the brilliant ideas he had conceived while drinking the previous night.

“If you have a tough, dangerous job, critical to national security, Dewey’s your man,” Robert M. Gates, the former director of central intelligence and later defense secretary, was quoted as saying in “Casey,” a 1990 biography of William J. Casey, the Central Intelligence Agency’s chief during the Reagan administration, by Joseph E. Persico. “Just make sure you have a good lawyer at his elbow — Dewey’s not easy to control.”

He spent years overseas as an undercover officer, but perhaps his most consequential effort at the spy agency was the creation of the Counterterrorism Center (then called the Counterterrorist Center) in 1986 after a string of attacks the previous year, including the hijacking of TWA Flight 847 and the massacres at El Al ticket counters in Rome and Vienna carried out by the Abu Nidal Organization.

Up to that point, the C.I.A. had devoted little effort to understanding international terrorism, and Mr. Clarridge persuaded Mr. Casey to create the center with an unusual arrangement: having undercover spies and intelligence analysts working together to try to dismantle terrorist networks. Within a year, C.I.A. operations had significantly weakened the Abu Nidal organization.

Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the Counterterrorism Center has grown into a behemoth, the heart of a spy agency transformed by years of terrorist hunting.

Mr. Clarridge’s efforts against international terrorism came as he was becoming ensnared by investigations into the Reagan administration’s efforts to use proceeds from secret arms sales to Iran to arm the contras, a Nicaraguan rebel group battling troops of the country’s socialist government, known as the Sandinistas.

Mr. Clarridge had been in charge of the C.I.A.’s covert war in Nicaragua in the early 1980s (he told his colleagues that his idea to mine the harbors of Nicaragua in 1983 came while he was drinking gin at home) and had developed a close relationship with Lt. Col. Oliver North, who was running the Iran-contra operation from his perch at the National Security Council.

According to the final report by Lawrence E. Walsh, the independent counsel investigating the Iran-contra affair, Mr. Clarridge testified that he had no knowledge that cargo ships sent to Iran to help secure the release of American hostages contained any weapons. He also denied trying to solicit money from foreign countries to circumvent a congressional prohibition against financing the contras.

“In both instances,” the report said, “there was strong evidence that Clarridge’s testimony was false.”

He was indicted on a charge of perjury in 1991, three years after he had retired from the agency. President George Bush pardoned him on Christmas Eve 1992, along with five other Iran-contra figures. He had the pardon framed, and he eventually hung it in the front hallway of his home near San Diego so it would be the first thing visitors saw upon entering his house.

But the scandal embittered him, and he used his 1997 memoir, “A Spy for All Seasons,” to settle some old scores. He lamented in the book that the C.I.A. had lost its swagger since the end of the Cold War, becoming a risk-averse organization that was beholden to lawyers and was degenerating “into something resembling the style, work ethic and morale of the post office.”

Read the Remainder at New York Times

Espionage Files: A CIA Officer’s Long, Futile Secret War

CIA

WASHINGTON — In Douglas Laux’s final days as a CIA officer, the futility of his mission prompted him to quote George Orwell to his boss.

Laux had spent months in 2012 working with various Middle Eastern nations that were trying to ship arms to Syria to help disparate rebel groups there. But it had become clear to him that the CIA had little ability to control the squabbling and backstabbing among the Saudis, Qataris and other Arabs.

He told a senior CIA officer he felt like Winston Smith, the character in “1984” known for his fatalism, because he was carrying out his work without comprehending the politics and competing agendas thwarting progress in aiding the rebellion. “I understand the how,” Laux said, paraphrasing one of Smith’s famous lines. “I do not understand the why.”

It is a sentiment that might sum up much of Laux’s career at the CIA, an organization he served for eight years as an undercover case officer and soldier in the agency’s shadowy conflicts overseas. His career at the agency began with a tour at a remote firebase in southern Afghanistan and ended with a spot on the agency’s Syria Task Force — a life in war zones that is emblematic of the lives of a large cadre of U.S. spies who joined the CIA after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. He left the agency three years ago, but is speaking publicly about his experiences there for the first time in conjunction with the release of a memoir.

The collective weight of all CIA memoirs written since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks could collapse a bookshelf, but Laux brings a raw perspective to the canon. His memoir is not filled with recollections of White House meetings or lengthy defenses of waterboarding. Laux was thousands of miles from Washington, a grunt in a secret war.

“We have officers who have only done war zone stuff since they walked in the door,” said Laux, an intense, sometimes edgy 33-year-old with an athletic build and a trimmed beard. “The big question for the CIA is whether it can be sustained, and whether it finds enough people to invest that time psychologically and emotionally.” Laux spoke in a recent interview in a quiet Washington bar owned by one of his friends.

Read the Remainder at Boston Globe

https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/r20160329/r20110914/client/ext/m_js_controller.js
// // <![CDATA[
(function(_){var Xl=function(){this.ri=[];this.kp={}};Xl.prototype.report=function(){for(var a=[],b=0;b<this.ri.length;++b)a.push(Yl(this.ri[b]));return a};var Yl=function(a){var b=[a.key,a.value];_.r(a.Fm)&&b.push(a.Fm);return b},Zl={};var $l={1:0,2:1,4:8,5:6,8:11,9:2,6:9,34:25,26:15,3:7,20:12,24:26,33:11,25:0},am=function(a,b,c,d){var e=$l[b];4==b&&(b=(d=d.currentTarget)?d.getAttribute(“data-absm”):c.getAttribute(b,”data-absm”),”e”==b?e=12:”db”==b?e=29:”dd”==b&&(e=30));(0,window.ja)(a,e)},bm=function(a){return function(){a()}},cm=function(a){return a.report()};_.u(“registerAd”,function(a,b){_.r(Zl[b])||(Zl[b]=new Xl);a.registerClickUrlModifier(_.ga(cm,Zl[b]));for(var c=[1,2,4,8,6,9,5,3,20,34,26,24,33,25],d=0;d//