FBI Raids Project Veritas Staffer In Probe Over Biden Daughter’s Diary

Furthering the Proof the FBI is nothing more than Biden’s personal Stasi.

 

Courtesy of ZeroHedge. -NCS The FBI raided two addresses in New York on Thursday linked to Project Veritas, as part of a probe into the alleged theft of President Biden’s daughter’s diary, according to the… 334 more words

FBI Raids Project Veritas Staffer In Probe Over Biden Daughter’s Diary — American Partisan

Our First Amendment

From DTI

“Our First Amendment was not designed to protect speech you love. It is there to protect speech you hate.”  –Larry Flynt

 

Having and expressing “non-government-approved thoughts” is not a crime in America (see above)!

But, it has suddenly been made a “crime” by the new Administration, particularly for NG troopers, the same troopers who, assigned to DC during the inauguration, were not allowed to have magazines in their rifles, even empty magazines, because it might “look menacing.”

Those same unarmed troopers have now been unceremoniously thrown-out of government buildings where they had been standing-by and told to camp-out in parking lots, with no restrooms, no heat, no facilities.

This utter contempt with which troopers are being treated pretty much demonstrates what leftist politicians think of our military!

In fact, the leftist NY Times is encouraging our troopers to rat on their brothers.

Who “liked” a Trump Facebook post has to be a “far-right extremist,” with “a propensity toward racism, xenophobia, anti-government sentiments,”

Oh my!

Sorry NYT, but this is America, and none of that is illegal!

Curiously, the NYT apparently does not consider “far-left extremists” to be of any concern!

NYT editorialists, little more than marionettes for the DNC, obviously see nothing wrong with an aggressive “turn-in-your-neighbor” program, where anyone harboring “non-government-approved-thoughts” can be identified, labeled, put on a “List,” excluded from participation,

and all that is just for starters!

This is so Stalinesque!

“A strength of Communism is that it has the character of a religion, and inspires emotions of a religion” –Albert Einstein

A Modest Proposal: Sensible Regulation of Books

A Modest Proposal: Sensible Regulation of Books

 

A Great satire article to drive home the point of this sham called “Common Sense Gun Control” liberals and RINO’s alike are trying push on the American people.

Don’t Fall for It.

Keep Your Powder Dry, Your Nose in the Wind and Your Eyes on the Skyline.

Crusader Corner: The EU’s New “Online Speech Code” and Facebook’s Crusade Against “Islamophobia”

This is mind blowing folks…I received this email from GateStone Institute, a non-profit Think Tank in New York that is beginning to be censored by the EU (and Facebook) for their fervent stand against Anti-Semitism, islam and terrorism. I am not posting this to help them raise money, I just wanted you guy to see the ANTICS of the EU and Facebook regarding so-called “Hate Speech” toward islam…give me a break!!

We are literally witnessing Orwell’s predictions come true right before our eyes. Next they will begin monitoring and putting restrictions on our thought life..-SF

islam

 

Dear Friend of Gatestone,

On Tuesday, the European Union (EU) announced a new online speech code to be enforced by four major tech companies, including Facebook and YouTube.

On Wednesday, Facebook deleted the account of Ingrid Carlqvist, Gatestone’s Swedish expert.

It’s no coincidence.

Ingrid had posted our latest video to her Facebook feed — called “Sweden’s Migrant Rape Epidemic.” As you can see, Ingrid calmly lays out the facts and statistics, all of which are meticulously researched.

It’s a video version of this research paper that Gatestone published last year. The video has gone viral — racking up more than 80,000 views in its first two days.

But the EU is quite candid: it is applying a political lens to their censorship, and it now has teams of political informants — with the Orwellian title of “trusted reporters” — to report any cases of “xenophobia” or “hate speech” to Facebook for immediate deletion.

It’s political censorship. It’s outrageous. And it’s contrary to our western values of free speech, political freedom and the separation of mosque and state. But in another way, it’s a tremendous compliment — the world’s censors think that Gatestone Institute’s work is important enough and persuasive enough that it needs to be silenced.

Well, not if we have anything to say about it. We raised such a ruckus about this attack that the Swedish media started reporting on Facebook’s heavy-handed censorship. It backfired, and Facebook went into damage-control mode. They put Ingrid’s account back up — without any explanation or apology. Ironically, their censorship only gave Ingrid’s video more attention.

Facebook and the EU have backed down — for today. But they’re deadly serious about stopping ideas they don’t like. They’ll be back.

So what should we do? I think there is only one thing we can do: continue to produce our well-researched reports, and to expand our online presence with even more videos!

As you know, just last week we started releasing high-quality original videos, hosted by our Gatestone experts. Our first four videos have already been watched by more than 150,000 people!

It’s a great way to make our research come alive — and as Ingrid’s viral video shows, to get our ideas noticed.

So I want Gatestone’s talented experts to make more videos — a lot more! We need to win the battle of ideas. Can you help?

Each video costs us approximately $500 to produce. But as Facebook’s attack on us shows, they’re worth every penny.

Will you help us do that?

If you can sponsor one video, for $500, that would be a powerful statement of your support for our ideas — and your resistance to the Facebook/EU censorship. But even a $50 gift would be so helpful — if just 100 Gatestone supporters chipped in $50, that’s enough to produce ten more powerful video presentations — any one of which could go viral too!

Facebook and the European Union thought they could shut us up. I want to prove them wrong. Please click here, to help us fight back. Do it for Ingrid!

Yours truly,

Nina Rosenwald
President and Founder, Gatestone Institute

P.S. Click here to see all of our YouTube videos so far. I want to do so many more, and with more of our experts. It’s a great way to spread our message, especially in the age of short, shareable videos. Please consider contributing $50, $500 or whatever you can!

P.P.S. We’ve never been censored this way before. I think it means we’re making a difference. What do you think?

Stay Alert, Stay Armed, Keep the Faith and Stay Dangerous!

 

Conneticut State Police and Open Carry: “Gotta Cover our Ass”

I typically do not post “protest” videos on my blog because often the video do not tell the whole story and are sometimes heavily edited and cut to show a certain “agenda”… but this video is different. The illegal actions of the cops are not just “inferred” in the video, they are plain and evident through audio of the cops talking to one another trying to figure out how to frame this poor guy. Throughout this video I kept thinking to myself how easy all of this could have been avoided if the cops only knew how to turn OFF a camera!! I guess one of the lessons involved beside the obvious is if you are going to protest, buy a camera that is complicated to turn off!! In the 21st Century, you can bet somebody is always watching or recording!-SF

The First and Second Amendments protect and reinforce each other.

In a free society, there is always pressure to expand the power of the government to suppress freedom of speech.  Those in power, for the last 100 years, have been infringing on our right to bear arms, and claiming that those who support the Second Amendment are kooks, in an attempt to suppress our First Amendment rights.

With the voice provided by the First Amendment and the Internet, brave activists have been rolling back those attacks on the First and Second Amendments, and have been winning important victories.

Michael Picard is one such activist in Connecticut.  It takes a brave man to stand up to several Connecticut State Troopers, and calmly and rationally demand his rights.  It takes more guts to decide to continue the fight in court, when an easy out is offered.

Here are the words of Michael Picard:

Back on Friday, September 11th, 2015, in West Hartford, CT, I was illegally detained, frisked and searched, and my gun, permit and camera were seized, I was threatened with arrest for interfering (apparently, freedom of speech passes for interfering), and the Connecticut State Police fabricated a story, on camera, to trump up the charges because they needed to charge me with something (“Let’s give him something.”) to cover their ass (“Gotta cover our ass.”), charging me with “creating a public disturbance” for legally open carrying my firearm and “negligent pedestrian” for legally holding up a sign on public property, as well as being threatened with arrest (again) if I did not pay the fine. I was detained for 40 minutes and charged for nothing more than legally open carrying and holding up a sign on public property. I never touched my gun once and I am a legal gun owner. My lawyer and I went to the first court appearance back on Thursday, January 14th, 2016, where the prosecutor offered a $25 fine, in lieu of the original $300 fine, to make the case go away. I rejected the deal because I did nothing wrong. As of now, the prosecutor has not dropped the case despite having video evidence of police misconduct. The trial date has been set for Monday, April 25th, 2016, at 9:30am, at the New Britain courthouse (20 Franklin Sq., New Britain, CT).

The video speaks for itself.  I found particularly chilling the words of an Unidentifed Trooper:

“And then claim that, um, in backup, we had multiple people,um, they didn’t want to stay and give us a statement, so we took our own course of action.”

There are several felonies in that statement.  It shows how far down the path to a police state we have gone. There is obstruction of justice.  There is conspiracy.  There is denial of rights under color of law.  And, I am not a lawyer.

Sure, the police have a tough job.

But it is not too much to ask that they follow the rules. If the rules are too complex for them, they are far too complex for those who are not lawyers, and need to be rolled back.  It appears to me that Michael did not break any laws.  He is an activist.  In our litigious society, he has to be very careful that he does not break the rules.  He knows he has a target on his back.  The police did not like what he was doing, but even they admitted that what he was doing was legal, on the video.

If the prosecution is smart, they will cut a deal now, including a cash settlement and retraining for the police department.  It is likely to be the cheapest that they will get out of the situation.

Think of yourself on a jury, in Connecticut, not that far from where the Freddie Grey incident occurred.  Consider listening to the police discussing how they will concoct charges against you.  It might not happen.  In Detroit, a judge ruled that such video, from a dash cam, could not be seen by jurors.  In that case, the jury found the open carrier not guilty, very quickly, without the dash cam video.  But Connecticut is not Detroit.

We need activists to keep the police honest.  Digital recorders and the Internet are helping make that happen.  The police could simply have ignored Michael and done nothing, as it appears they should have done.  Or, they could have calmly approached him and asked what he was doing.

Instead, the video shows that they concocted a scheme to harass Michael with false charges to “Cover their Ass”.  It is a grave miscarriage of justice, and it should not be tolerated.

The police work for us.  We are not their servants or their serfs. Even in Connecticut.

©2016 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.  Link to Gun Watch

Read the Original Article at Ammo-Land