Let’s not forget this kind of bullshit has been going on in the UK for more than a decade now with help from the corrupt and complicit British Government and Law enforcement.
Schoolgirls protesting in Dover after 4 Afghan teenage boys raped a 15-year-girl in school.
They say the girl is too scared to go back to the school, all girls are afraid in the area, girls have been told how to dress for school in assembly with having Afghans in their school! pic.twitter.com/wSdu65fDay
The idea of a collapse because of mass immigration is flawed, though it was popular in our part of the internet for many years. The fall of civilisations are never really as clear cut as we like to think. In history civilisations rise and fall but usually there is more of a transition than an outright Armageddon scenario. When the Western Roman Empire collapsed, the new realms which emerged, like those of the Franks and Ostrogoths, were ruled by Germanic elites who intermarried with Roman patricians. These societies were hybrids that deteriorated over several centuries, with classical infrastructure like aqueducts falling into disrepair gradually. In many ways the early medieval period was akin to a High Street where half the shops are boarded up.
Elites favour their own interests above all and are not coming to our rescue. One may think hypothetically that some Alfred the Great-like figure would rouse the English to reclaim their destiny. Yet history shows that elites are far more likely to embrace the new conquerors to preserve their wealth and status once the initial war is over. That war was fought and lost in the 1960s, and in my view this is one of the reasons why global liberalism is now seen as the ‘correct line of thinking’ for middle and upper class people. The elites have switched their allegiance from national to international, from their own people to global liberalism. And in the 5th century, the remaining Roman patricians married off their daughters to Germanic conquerors in return for positions and other reasons. Status is hardwired into our brains, and the temptation for many is too strong.
Even though the Great Replacement is happening, they’ll deny it’s happening while celebrating the fact that it’s happening, and they’ll call you crazy for daring to notice that it’s happening. That’s precisely how twisted they are. And if you get mad about the web of lies they spin like a noose around your throat, they’ll simply say, “See? He’s crazy! Told you so!”
A little over a century ago in The Rising Tide of Color: The Threat Against White World-Supremacy, Lothrop Stoddard warned that whites would eventually drown in a tide of population surges by other groups.
In 1913, the combined population of Europe and “Western offshoots” was about one-third of the total global populace. Whites currently comprise about 16% of the world’s population, a quotient that is expected to fall to 10% by 2060.
Whites have always been a global minority, but they’re en route to becoming an even tinier minority than ever before, all while the global propaganda machine has demonized their very existence. Why does this sound like a bad movie plot?
Ever since I was a kid, being a minority was considered a good thing. Well, it was a bad thing in the sense that you were presumed to suffer constant oppression from incurably cruel whites, but we were taught that the role of government was to protect the weak and marginalized from bullying. So one is to presume that when whites achieve minority status, this will be a good thing . . . right?
Say hello to the global majority — i.e., what we used to refer to as “minorities”:
Global majority is a collective term for ethnic groups which constitute approximately 80 per cent of the global population . . .
The term was used as early as 2003 as a way to challenge the normativity of a Eurocentric perspective. Its proponents argue that terms like “ethnic minority” marginalize the skills, the ways of thinking, and the lived experiences of those from African, Asian, indigenous, or dual-heritage backgrounds. These terms were therefore seen as racializing ethnicity.
For years the British media has been using the acronym BAME (Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic) as an umbrella term for all non-whites in the United Kingdom. In 2020, spurred into hastily guilty action over the death of model citizen George Floyd, the Church of England stopped using the clunky term “United Kingdom Minority Ethnic” (UKME) in favor of the even clunkier “United Kingdom Minority Ethnic/Global Majority Heritage” (UKME/GMH). This was apparently done to remind indigenous Britons that although ethnic invaders may still be a minority in England, they are a majority worldwide and can sweep them up in a tsunami of color whenever they wish. It’s frightening to think that the global majority is perched right outside of your tiny island, staring you down at all times.
England’s Westminster City Council recently moved to drop the term “BAME” and replace it with “global majority” in an attempt to be more “inclusive and diverse” toward everyone except indigenous Britons. An official statement read:
We do not use the terms BAME (black, Asian and minority ethnic) and BME (black and minority ethnic) because they emphasise certain ethnic minority groups (Asian and black) and exclude others . . . The terms can also mask disparities between different ethnic groups and create misleading interpretations of data. . . . Similarly, we do not use people of colour as it doesn’t include white minorities. Our aim is to look and tackle inequalities and disparities wherever they are seen. That’s what we are doing through the levelling-up agenda.
What is a “white minority,” you ask? It’s anyone in the UK who is not English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh, or Romani. In other words, the Westminster City Council is pitting everyone in the world, even whites who aren’t native to the British Isles, against its own indigenous population.
I’m not sure why the Romani wound up on the “wrong side of history,” but I’ve never liked them anyway, so I shed no tears.
But the term “global majority” is being adopted by non-whites across this dying planet.
The term “people of color” centers whiteness even as it attempts to be an affirming identity label for non-white people. The term perpetuates the pernicious idea that whiteness is the default and white people therefore have no particular race. Race is a special identity marker that is only assigned to people who are not white; who are the other. Race comes with color. Non-white people are subsequently of color by virtue of not being color-free, white people. . . . The term “people of the global majority” affirms non-white people’s inherent power as the majority of the world’s population. This is in contrast to the fact that people of color in the U.S. are often considered minorities even as they will outnumber white people in the country by as early as 2050. . . . It enables global solidarity against white supremacy without cultural erasure.
In other words, so long as whites are being erased from the global discussion, non-whites can oppose them and bask in their own newfound racial power while pretending they’re against racism. We can be inclusive so long as we exclude whites. The minute that whites have been officially acknowledged as a minority, the roles have switched: Minorities are no longer in need of protection, and the majority is no longer a bully.
The lies have been stacked so high, it can cause a peckerwood like me to faint.
You must be logged in to post a comment.