Raise The Shield Wall!

Raise The Shield Wall!

 

I say it is time to raise the shield wall.

Especially when Western civilization is engaged in a life and death struggle for its very survival and our enemies are attempting to twist the very lexicon and identity forming descriptors we have used for centuries to define ourselves, in an attempt to supposedly ‘de-toxify’ what they perceive as ‘white supremacist’ terms.

A perfect example is the disingenuous way historians like  Dr. Mary Rambaran-Olm, a fellow at the University of Toronto, who specializes in race in early England and Sherif Abdelkarim at John Hopkins University, who apparently studies Early English language, assert that “First-millennium Britain offers one glimpse into the extent to which communities mixed and flourished…. suggesting extensive exchange and assimilation among Britain’s inhabitants and settlers.”

Their colleague Paul Edward Montgomery Ramírez, a Nicaraguan-American archaeologist, desperate to exaggerate the significance of a theological expression used by Alfred the Great, “You must not oppress foreigners and strangers, because you were once strangers in the land of Egypt,” making a timely intervention (especially coming from someone who shares the same heritage as the people currently rushing America’s southern border) to remind us that Britain was always multicultural.

And please remember the International Society of Anglo Saxonists (ISAS) have only recently been forced to drop the term Anglo Saxon and the academic department at Cambridge specializing in Anglo-Saxon, Norse and Celtic, as well as the longstanding Chairs of Anglo Saxon at Oxford (most famously held by J.R.R. Tolkien) have also been attacked for using such a divisive name.

Which brings me back to my core point.

Anyone making a detailed study of early English charters will see the predominant usage of the expressions englisc and angelcynn rather than Anglo Saxon (think also of the Roman Tacitus and the word Anglii)The very term Anglo Saxon was coined in fact on the continent to differentiate between German and English Saxons.

But accuracy is tangential to the reasons behind the arguments being put forward by the likes of  Rambaran-Olm, Abdelkarim and Gonzalez, who are in fact attempting to deconstruct the very meaning of the words Anglo Saxon, arguing fallaciously that “Archaeological evidence shows that people of sub-Saharan African descent lived in early England.”

I have even heard the descriptor Afro-Saxon being used. Politically correct historians abusing the fact that the descriptor Anglo Saxon was rarely used prior to the Norman Conquest of 1066 and became more common at the time of the British Empire’s major expansion in the nineteenth century in order to demonstrate the term was being applied to imply the superiority of “white people” by the Victorians.

Today’s liberal propagandists operating in the field of medieval studies increasingly trying to cast aside the use of the expression “Anglo-Saxon” because they continually insist it denotes Western superiority with one media article related to Rambaran-Olm’s work, ignoring the acclaimed work of academics like Stenton, Hill, Crossley-Holland, Hook, Carver, Campbell, Higham, Wood and Morris and instead saying:

‘Because in their (the left wing deconstructionists) view it has more connection to white hoods than boar-decorated helmets. The record shows that myths about the past can be exploited to create hateful policies. But as perceptive readers, we can arm ourselves against hate by wielding historical precision as a weapon’.

Which is why we need to defend the use of such terms as Anglo Saxon, Norse and Celtic, until we control these centres of research and teaching because it is for us, not our anti-white enemies, to provide nuance to these identities.

Especially given the reality that our people currently recognize such expressions as they relate to their ancestors. Indeed, walk into any bookshop and you will see, for now at least, histories referring to Anglo Saxons and Celts. That must be our starting point. Our cultural outreach must begin on such familiar ground.

Especially when it so rich and fascinating, contributing to who and what we are and linking us forever to the land that is ours by right of inheritance.

 

Biden Calls Law-Abiding Americans ‘The Resistance’

Biden Calls Law-Abiding Americans ‘The Resistance’

 

Reminds me of an article I wrote some years back titled: Are You Prepared to be an Outlaw?

Gear up and Prepare Accordingly Folks, this Government has gone off the Rails.

 

The ‘Civil War’ Psy-Op

The ‘Civil War’ Psy-Op

 

Psy-ops can have many objectives, demoralization being the most common. But they can also be used to prep the ground for other operations, to create opportunities that otherwise might not present themselves.

That’s what’s going on now. The regime wishes to crush all actual and potential opposition. To do this, it needs to criminalize dissent. But doing that runs against the letter and spirit of the great charters of American liberty, and against the grain of the American character. To do what they want to do requires changing public opinion. Or, more specifically, it requires wearing down Americans’ inborn resistance to censorship and political persecution.

But as much as Americans hate those things, they also hate and fear even the prospect of terrorism, civil strife, and domestic conflict. Here we come to another dog resolutely not barking. There is no terrorism, civil strife, or domestic conflict—at least not coming from the Right. Yet the Department of Justice recently created a “domestic terrorism unit” to target “those who are motivated by racial animus, as well as those who ascribe to extremist anti-government and anti-authority ideologies.”

Read carefully that unusually candid statement. They aren’t going after actual terrorists or terrorist acts. I suppose they would if they could find any. But there aren’t any to be found.

So instead they’re targeting motives, animus, and ideologies—i.e., ideas and feelings, not actual acts. 

Celebrating the Ultimate Thought Criminal: Colin Flaherty

“Crime Is The New Black Entitlement”

 

I urge all my readers to go back and watch Colin’s Podcast and Interviews.

The guy was a Voice Crying out in the Wilderness for White People to OPEN their eyes.

The Purging of the U.S. Military

US Marines Undergoing a ‘Political Purge’, Being ‘Crushed’ by Biden’s Vaccine Mandate

 

A full blown Political Purge is currently underway in the U.S. Military under the guise of “COVID Vax Mandates”.

Of course if you have been paying attention, as soon as Mr. “Sniffer Shit My Pants” Biden took office in 2020 he began “culling” the U.S. Military…but why?

History gives us our definitive answer.

In order for a tyrant to rule he has to control the Military 100%.

The Military is a double-edged sword to a tyrant.

It can be his most decisive tool in executing his agenda OR it can be his greatest Foe in terms of a coup.

When looked at in this light, the very loud crackdown on so-called “Right Wing Extremism” and “White Supremacy” or any Ideology which does not line up with the woke global marxist worldview, begins to make sense.

Of course the X Factor in this fucked up equation are VETERANS.

Tens of thousands of men trained by Uncle Sam and baptized in the fire of combat in Iraq and Afghanistan who are now mature civilians with their eyes wide open with ideologies ranging from “Tame” to “So Far Right he fell off the fucking scale”.

I will leave the rest to your imagination.

Prepare Accordingly.